Narnia Code – A Must Have!

If you have not read The Narnia Code or seen the video, you’ve got to do it.  Michael Ward has insights as to how Lewis composed the Narnian Chronicles that will transform the way you think about the books and will open up new vistas in your reading of them as well.  I can’t recommend his material highly enough.

I’ve shared below a video of his interview with Eric Metaxas a couple of years ago as a sample of the kind of thing you will learn from The Narnia Code.  Would make a great Christmas present! Enjoy!

Feel free to share this post
Facebooktwittermail
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Hymn for the Weight of Glory sermon

univ-ch-pulpit-cropped

This is the hymn that was sung at the service where Lewis preached his sermon, “The Weight of Glory.”

Bright the vision that delighted
Once the sight of Judah’s seer;
Sweet the countless tongues united
To entrance the prophet’s ear.

Round the Lord in glory seated
Cherubim and seraphim
Filled His temple, and repeated
Each to each the alternate hymn:

“Lord, Thy glory fills the Heaven;
Earth is with its fullness stored;
Unto Thee be glory given,
Holy, holy, holy Lord.”

Heaven is still with glory ringing,
Earth takes up the angels’ cry,
“Holy, holy, holy,” singing,
“Lord of hosts, the Lord most high.”

With His seraph train before him,
With His holy Church below,
Thus conspire we to adore Him,
Bid we thus our anthem flow.

“Lord, Thy glory fills the Heaven;
Earth is with its fullness stored;
Unto Thee be glory given,
Holy, holy, holy Lord.”

Richard Mant, Ancient Hymns, 1837

Feel free to share this post
Facebooktwittermail
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A century of evil enchantment

empty-classroom

Today, I received the following in an e-mail:

I was wondering if you could answer a question for me please? Early in “Weight of Glory” Lewis says “And you and I have need of the strongest spell that can be found to wake us from the evil enchantment of worldliness which has been laid upon us for nearly a hundred years”. I assume the hundred years would be about 1845 to 1945. Can you tell me what he is referring to by “nearly a hundred years”?

BTW, the quote he refers to comes from the fifth paragraph.

Here’s my answer:
In answer to your question, lets pick up the flow of Lewis’ thought in this part of the sermon. He is setting forth an aspect of what we call his “argument from desire.” It is an idea about the universe that there is a correspondence between the things we seem to desire or need and the existence – somewhere – of an ultimate satisfaction for that desire or need. Indeed, the existence of this ultimate, satisfying reality is the cause, as it were, for the existence of the desires and needs. In the case of our desire and need for God, Lewis likes to talk about what he elsewhere calls “joy.” Here, he uses the terms “suggestion,” a “reminder,” an “inner voice,” and “a longing for the transtemporal.”

He says in the sermon that, by bringing these experiences up, he is trying to weave a spell to counter another spell. He is setting forth a vision of the universe to counter another vision of the universe. He is using imaginative language, and reference to the experience of his hearers, to foster a vision of this reality to counter the one we have acquired from our modern, western environment.

Lets think about how he describes this other spell. He says it is an evil enchantment of worldliness. Now remember that he is preaching a sermon in a church to professing Christians. Worldliness is one of the 3 primary evil enemies of the church, the others being the “flesh” and the devil. Worldliness is conforming our way of thinking and our very thoughts to the pattern and ideals of the world around us, which are based upon ungodliness and thus evil. In effect, Lewis is here seeking to root out the sin of worldliness in his congregation. He wants them to wake up to an awareness of something they have “bought into” which is robbing them of a Christian interaction with our universe and the Reality behind it.

And how did this worldliness creep into their lives over the last century? Through the schools they have attended. You note that in the next sentence he begins to address education. He spends the rest of the paragraph exposing the agenda of modern philosophies which have tried to shut us off from our true selves and the truth of the universe we live in. He wants us aware of this false understanding of the world we have imbibed through our schools so that we will begin to resist it and be open to a truer vision.

Much of this is part of what Lewis writes about in The Abolition of Man. In The Abolition of Man, Lewis speaks of how it was that, before modern times, educators believed in an ideal correspondence between the material universe and a fitting or appropriate emotional reaction to it. In other words, our feelings corresponded to the reality of what is around us. We could thus talk about whether one emotional reaction to an object or event (say a painting or a coronation) were more appropriate than another. A break from this idea occurred when people began to deny any such ordering of our feelings, that there was a human soul that could have such a correspondence with Creation. Instead, humans and everything else in the universe were thought to be simply a random interaction of matter. One could point to the writings of Karl Marx as an important mile-stone for the popularization of materialism about 100 years before Lewis writes his sermon.

In light of the above considerations, I would say, in answer to your question, that his reference to nearly a hundred years is to the past century of education in the schools of England dominated by modern, materialistic philosophy. Materialism kills the ability to recognize what is happening to us when we experience the longing of that “suggestion” or “reminder.” It makes us think that it is only some psychological trick, based on our biological and genetic needs, instead of a spiritual reality, of something that is an indicator of the truth about what humans are and the universe they live in.

Do let me know if you have any other questions and thanks so much for writing!

Image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/funky64/2960218105/sizes/l/

Feel free to share this post
Facebooktwittermail
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Further Up & In – Ptolemy and Lewis’ Imagination

medieval-christian-cosmoloy

I wrote this in Nov. of 2006; so, ten years later, thought I’d post it again. 🙂

My students have just gotten through Dante’s Inferno and Paradiso (we did not purposefully leave out the Purgatorio, but I should not take space here on just what happened). While preparing for class, I read Lewis’ Studies in Renaissance and Medieval Literature. I was familiar with the Ptolemaic view of the universe, but Lewis “filled in the corners” for me in several places.

He describes the medieval person as looking up and into the universe above, as over against the modern way of looking, which is out and away into the vast reaches of matter. The medieval looked up, because Earth was at the bottom of the planetary hierarchy. He looked “into” the universe because the root of Earthly being is found ultimately in the Empyrean, even in God Himself, who dwells above us, beyond the outermost sphere of this universe.

Beside the “up” and “in” way of looking, the medieval person also considered the spiritual world of the Empyrean to be like our world, only inside out. The farther away from Earth you get, the richer and broader is our experience of Reality.

I was reflecting on this view of the universe when the words “up” and “in” hit me like a brick. Combined with the “inside out” description of the Empyrean, I immediately recognised the source of the Narnian expression, “further up and further in,” and just what that going further up and in was like as we read of it in The Last Battle.

Now let me throw this in: I have decided that I like the Ptolemaic view of the universe quite a bit. To the modern mind, nothing is worth considering unless it is based on observation and rational analysis in the materialistic, “scientific” mode of our day. But it all depends on the question you are wanting to ask. The modern man only wants to ask, “What is there materially?” The Christian should go beyond that question and ask, “What is there in the whole of its nature?” We are, of course, interested in the truth of what is materially present in any object, because God has made it so. But the Christian recognises that nothing detectable by our senses should be divorced from whatever may be its connection to the Mind behind its existence.

The universe is Created. There is more than the material about everything because the context of all includes more than the material; it includes the Personal, in varying ways and degrees. The Ptolemaic view includes the personal elements that Christians believe to be present. The Copernican view is more true regarding the material existence of the universe, but the Ptolemaic is more true regarding its immaterial existence. As Lewis points out, all theories of the nature of the universe are models. The Copernican view has always been another model, and it has regularly been updated.

I find it most interesting that the Intelligent Design model is, in a sense, a move back toward the truth in the Ptolemaic model. I’m all for it. Let Love for God spring into the dance of the spheres again!

Image credit: http://www.luminarium.org/encyclopedia/medievalcosmology.htm

Feel free to share this post
Facebooktwittermail
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Lewis “festoons” the Lord’s Prayer

plain-of-gennesaret

The Plain of Gennesaret from the Mount of Beatitudes, Galilee. Image credit: http://www.chrisinukraine.com/news/

In Letters to Malcolm, numbers 3 and 4, Lewis tells us how he would add his own personal thought-associations to the phrases in the Lord’s Prayer.  These were things he wanted to remember as he used the prayer privately.  I’ve gathered them together below, wording his thoughts in a summary fashion that helps the prayer move along.

Our Father who art in heaven,
To whom I pray with angels and archangels and all the company of heaven,
Hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come,
May it be realized,
That kingdom that is in the unfallen parts of this beautiful Creation – beyond the suffering of humans and animals;
    That kingdom that dwells in the hearts of all the best lives of your saints in this world;
    That kingdom where rejoice the blessed dead.
Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven
That divine plan and wisdom we patiently accept, though it may be difficult for us;
    May I have the grace to vigorously bring it to pass myself, bearing the mind of Christ as I do so, in both the little and big things of life;
    And may I have the grace to live in the blessings of the present.
Give us this day our daily bread.
All those things requisite and necessary as well for the body as the soul.
And forgive us our trespasses,
As we forgive those who trespass against us.*
And lead us not into temptation,

But deliver us from evil.
    Spare me, and do not answer my prayers if the answers would not be good for me.
For thine is the kingdom,
The Divine right to rule,
and the power,
For you alone are the 0mnipotent God,
and the glory,
That beauty for which we long
Forever and ever.  Amen.

*Lewis says he doesn’t need to festoon this one; it’s all too clear as it is!

Feel free to share this post
Facebooktwittermail
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Genius of “The Grand Miracle”

The twelfth-century mosaic in the Basilica of San Clemente in Rome; the Cross as the Tree of Life. https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/tree-life-0

The twelfth-century mosaic in the Basilica of San Clemente in Rome; the Cross as the Tree of Life.
https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/blog/tree-life-0

One of the wonderful things about Lewis’ article, “The Grand Miracle,” is that it incarnates the very virtue that Lewis says demonstrates the reality of the miracle of the Incarnation.  For one thing, he surprises us.  As Western moderns, we would have anticipated that Lewis would have reveled in the spirituality of the Christian religion or the more theological aspects of the Incarnation touching specifically upon “salvation”.  Instead, he revels in the truth of the Incarnation by reveling in nature.  The virtue of the Incarnation is the way it leads to the redemption and renewal of all of nature.

But note that his argument is not based upon abstract philosophical arguments, nor upon proof-texting from Scripture.  Rather, it is all a reflection upon the amazing complexity of nature, in its twisted ugliness and in its inherent beauties.  Especially, Lewis wants us to recognize that, because of the Incarnation – the whole story of Jesus, past, present and future – nature is going to be an even more wonderful thing than we have ever known.

Lewis in his own way incarnates the Incarnation in his examination of what the Incarnation means for us.  His  nature-focused explanation of the truth of the Incarnation enlightens our whole understanding of what Jesus has done for mankind.  It makes us think about the Christian story, the Christian religion, in a way that seems to be rather ignored by many.  It shines a grandeur upon the Christian faith by drawing in the whole story of the Creation, it’s fall, redemption, and renewal.  It causes passages of Scripture, such as Romans 8, to stand out in sharp relief, more than they do in sermons and books focused on “salvation” and “justification.”  It helps to open a door to Christian reflection on how we relate to the environment.  It helps us see our lives in that “whole, huge pattern” of Incarnation so that the very air we breath and the sun shining on the flowers and the birds singing in the trees leads us to think about our own personal and corporate redemption as humans.

I could go on, but my point is that the essay is like a missing chapter in much of Evangelical thinking about the story of Jesus.  Lewis, via this essay, steps into our minds, lifts them up from their limited perspectives, and brings us up into an air filled with wonder, both spiritual and natural.  We suddenly see ourselves in a truly sacramental universe.  We find the truth of Christian faith established in our hearts in a new and wonderful way that makes us to not only want to kiss the Cross, but the very earth on which we stand.

Feel free to share this post
Facebooktwittermail
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Lewis’ Anglicanism: Imagery in the Liturgy

Holy Trinity Church, Headington Quarry; the home church of C. S. Lewis

Holy Trinity Church, Headington Quarry; the home church of C. S. Lewis

Anyone who tries to keep up with the secondary literature on Lewis has to recognize that the idea of Lewis being a misogynist is pure balderdash. One of the greatest proofs of this fact is his essay in God in the Dock: “Priestesses in the Church.” While some look at this essay as a proof of the opposite, a close reading of it demonstrates his great esteem for the opposite sex.

In this essay, Lewis says that women are perfectly capable of doing all the things a man may do as a priest in the Church, save only one thing, and that one thing has nothing to do with capability. It has to do with the reality of gender in God’s universe. Our Lord is a guy. When the priest – standing in for the Lord – speaks as God’s representative to the Church (the Bride of Christ), the imagery presented requires that a man fill this role.

I have not, however, gotten back into this essay because I want to write about the idea of priestesses. I do so because of the glimpse that it gives us of one aspect of Lewis’ Anglicanism. We find here Lewis being sensitive to the imagery presented by the traditional liturgy. He writes as one who accepts and appreciates it. Indeed, it is this appreciation for the imagery in the liturgy in this particular instance that gives the reason for his position on priestesses. If he did not abide by this meaning behind the priest’s role in a particular part of the liturgy, he would have no reason to argue against priestesses.

Henry Blamires is quoted by Lyle Dorsett as saying, “Lewis was at times quite high on the Anglican spectrum and at other times rather low. It all depended upon the doctrine and the practice.” (1) We know that historic, low-church Anglicanism which used the Prayer Book and the basic elements of the traditional liturgy would not have made much of the imagery at issue above, though it is congruent with it. Holy Trinity, Headington Quarry – Lewis’ home church – was of this ilk. But it is apparent that, when Lewis attended his church, he did not have the same distaste for its liturgy that he may have had for the hymns being used – we know he tended not to like those. He appreciated the symbolic imagery he viewed at worship. One would also conclude that he would not have appreciated today’s low church Evangelical Anglicanism, which hardly consults the Prayer Book at all, and has little respect for the priestly imagery in the liturgy.

It must be mentioned, however, that in the first letter of Letters to Malcolm, Lewis states that he could bear with any liturgy just as long as it is the same at every service. This does not, of course, undo anything he has said in the above essay.

Being the imaginative and aesthetically oriented man that he was, it is no surprise that he would pick up on the symbolic imagery of the traditional liturgy and appreciate it. For those of us who are interested in Lewis as a case-study of Anglican laity, he reminds us of that great company that has tread and still treads The Narrow Road to Glory, uplifted and strengthened by the beauty of the drama in the traditional liturgy, as composed by Cranmer in The Book of Common Prayer.

Do you have a story of how the liturgy of the Prayer Book has been a benefit to you spiritually?  Why not share it with us in the comments below.  Thanks!

(1) Lyle Dorsett, Seeking the Secret Place – The Spiritual Formation of C. S. Lewis, p. 97.

Feel free to share this post
Facebooktwittermail
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Summarizing Lewis’ comments on Gethsemane

This video was shot in the orchard garden behind The Kilns in Oxford.  I summarize Lewis’ three main observations about Jesus’ prayer in the garden of Gethsemane in his book, Letters to Malcolm.  I will not be using this clip in my new course on the book, because the lighting didn’t work, as you will be able to see.  I wasn’t real wild about how it went either. Anyhow, the clip is about 5 & a half minutes.

Feel free to share this post
Facebooktwittermail
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Discerning the Body

I recorded this 1 minute video in the sanctuary of Holy Trinity Church, Headington Quarry, the home church of C. S. Lewis.  I refer to how Lewis takes the Church to task over its divisions related to The Lord’s Supper.  Click on the link below to see it.

session-7-c-2

Feel free to share this post
Facebooktwittermail
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Busy in Oxford

105_0611

That’s me at Holy Trinity Church, Headington Quarry, doing a video shoot for my course today.

Hey, Folks:

Sorry I’m behind posts, but this video course on Letters to Malcolm is keeping me pretty busy.  It’s like preparing a sermon or two, then delivering them, plus recording them on video (with all that involves), every day!   Whew!

I’ll be back on schedule when I get home.  🙂

Feel free to share this post
Facebooktwittermail
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment